Aerobic 10km challenge

Good thread :+1:

Resting: 37, Max: 179, Karvonen 75% = 145

I attempted this the other day. Course was a bit lumpy and I was working the hills and steady down. I think I’ll try it again on a flatter course and try to keep the HR steady.

image

5 Likes

We’re running it though

Where are power numbers coming from?

1 Like

Power comes from Garmin 945 + HRM - Tri Strap + CIQ Running Power. I record it but don’t really look at the data.

Here’s my six attempts for the year.
The bypass is by far and away the fastest, as it’s an out and back with no lights or junctions.

Also did a 10km ā€œeffortā€ in 38:15 in Feb,
But that was z3/4

5 Likes

Good job. What do you think you max effort 10k time would be atm?

Erm I’d be annoyed if I couldn’t do a 37:30 or under.

3 Likes

Thought I’d do a cheeky attempt today.

Didn’t look windy when I went out today, but had a headwind the last 1 1/2 miles which buggered me getting under 42

42:01 / 6:46 mile pace / 130 Av HR

6 Likes

My aerobic improvement continues.

Ran just under 6.5km today, with ~70m elevation, at 4.23/km pace with an average HR of 155. Hugely satisfying figures for me, showing a real change in my physiology over the past few years. These low HR figures, even when at my peak fitness were just unheard of. I wonder if it it’s purely age, or as a result of spending the past 3 years concentrating on long ultras and not doing any more than the random, odd bit of quick(er) stuff?

I think i need to do a 400s or 600s session and see how my top end HR is behaving nowadays to determine if my whole HR range has simply shifted downwards with age, or if it’s just the Z1 to lower Z3 distancing itself from my Z4 and above.

4 Likes

Sore calf so was going to take it easy today anyway.

22/04 48:29 @ 139 flat, great day, can’t complain.

4 Likes

Another datapoint. Concentrated on keeping HR down after letting it drift over the last few runs. Definately forced me to slow down, slowest run so far. Also warmest run so far, but suspect general fatigue is more relevant than ambient tempertuare.

date time pace av hr max hr cad str
14-Jan 41:25 04:09 137 148 160 1.51
28-Jan 43:38 04:22 128 142 158 1.45
05-Feb 43:25 04:20 129 142 158 1.46
12-Feb 43:29 04:21 129 136 159 1.45
12-Mar 42:33 04:15 132 142 159 1.49
09-Apr 41:50 04:11 141 156 160 1.50
23-Apr 45:26 04:33 129 138 158 1.39

Cadence stays the same, just stride shortens.

7 Likes

Still feeling my Sunday run of 16km 850mtrs so a tired…

27/04 48:06 @ 143 flat, cool conditions

7 Likes

From first part of a 13km run,

29/04 47:52 @ 139 slight uphill, cool & calm conditions

5 Likes
date time pace av hr max hr cad str
14-Jan 41:25 04:09 137 148 160 1.51
28-Jan 43:38 04:22 128 142 158 1.45
05-Feb 43:25 04:20 129 142 158 1.46
12-Feb 43:29 04:21 129 136 159 1.45
12-Mar 42:33 04:15 132 142 159 1.49
09-Apr 41:50 04:11 141 156 160 1.50
23-Apr 45:26 04:33 129 138 158 1.39
07-May 44:25 04:26 134 142 158 1.41

Still running tired at a slower pace for a higher hr.

3 Likes

Warm today ?!

Not particularly, but quite a strong cool breeze if I’m looking for excuses.

2 Likes

Another couple of runs to add.

13/05 48:35 @ 141 predominantly uphill, can’t remember conds
18/05 47:58 @ 142 flat, sunny & breezy

(Post edited after @buzz gave me 4/10 & @fruit_thief gave me 3/10)

7 Likes

But that was today right?

2 Likes

I’m going to have to edit my post aren’t I :joy: ?

Might need to edit it again too, unless you ran 10km in under 8 minutes

Looking like 3/10 I reckon :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Good consistent running though :clap:

1 Like

I had a go at this today, so my efforts are now:

13/4 42.20 @ 144
20/4 44.18 @ 148
29/4 44.06 @ 146
04/5 44.55 @ 146
18/5 44.03 @ 139

Target BPM is 145

4 Likes