definitely the latter
Yeah, at least a pair of Louboutins last more than 200km. Or do they? Paging @Poet
Probably last more time, but an awful lot less mileage. Probably more blisters than Blummenfeltâs feet as well!
Keep us updated.
Very interesting! Is this where we give the nerd a wedgie for doing maths?
#humblebrag
Whoa! hyper-mobility thumb!!
Unless youâre just starting out in TTâs, and your 10PB is on a hilly course and it was windy and you donât have a skin suit or pointy hat, and youâre still using your âtriathlonâ position. Then you have to make sure you mention that whenever youâre telling someone your time
But youâre right - once youâve got a PB from a dragstrip dual carriageway on a float day with an arms race bike, you stop thinking about the details, since you now have a time that sounds something like a club cyclist should have.
Donât wear them out in this weather Poet; itâll wreck those leather soles.
⌠with the chanel and gucci in the background as well!!
So pleased my wife isnât into shoes.
Handbags however
think iâm lucky there. Mine isnât into flashy clothing/accessories in the slightest. She likes her fashion and stuff, but sheâs much more wise with money than me. Sheâd never spend a fortune on a single item, regardless of what it was.
Theyâre right fashionistas in Knutsford init.
So I have bought fair weather shoes! That is the first and last time I succumb to marketing hype. And I have a cat. My life.
4% currently on offer on Nike website for ÂŁ146
Bloody hell!!!
Good shout
Looked at the template for the 220 Tri awards: Options for best running shoe brand, Nikes donât even make the long list. I know that publication like 220 need to keep sponsors happy, but this is a pathetic
Is this where I lament on the demise of 220, and wax lyrical on the good old 220 days of the late 80s>late 90s?

4% currently on offer on Nike website for ÂŁ146
Finally bitten the 4% bullet, thanks for that