Pro Cycling Live - will contain spoilers

Check out some of the trials riding if you can, absolutely ridiculous and the 26" mens final was a thriller

1 Like

Another great day’s racing in Glasgow.

Was in the thick of it out on the course doing line of sight. My ears are ringing from using the bloody whistle. Not had this since the last time I went to a gig years ago!

The crowds were fantastic again, I’ve spoken to so many amazing people these last few days. Big thing for me, right out of my comfort zone.

20 Likes

I chuckled and thought of TriTalk when I saw artistic cycling and cycle-ball day :grin:

Good effort for GBR there :+1:

2 Likes

I see Brad Wiggins’ son got a silver medal in the.junior TT.

4 Likes

Track. What’s C2 mean?

Silver medal had one leg. :tada:

Basically just that, cycling with one leg or other high level of dissabily. I’m C3 because I cycle with a prosthetic.

6 Likes

I guess it’s not obvious what other disabilities are equivalent to missing a leg. I assume it’s mental or nervous system for the gold medalist.

Hadn’t seen a reference to this but Dr Freeman has received a four year ban from UKAD. The GMC and UKAD are convinced that he bought the T-gel for a rider. That rider would either be BC or Sky but we don’t know who.

2 Likes

He was struck off as a doctor a couple of years ago, wasn’t he?

I can’t see him being able to work in sport even if he wanted to now :man_shrugging:

1 Like

No, it could’ve just been any old rider.

1 Like

You think he was doping a rider for a team he wasn’t working for?

If it was for any old rider surely he could just have written them a prescription?

From UKAD
"In March 2021, an MPTS tribunal found proven the allegation that Dr Freeman ordered testosterone, ‘knowing or believing’ it to be for an unnamed rider in May 2011 to improve their athletic performance. It was also found proven that he had lied to UKAD under investigation when claiming that the Testogel had been ordered for a ‘non-rider’ patient and had been returned to the supplier. The MPTS tribunal erased Dr Freeman from the Medical Register, a decision which was subsequently upheld by the High Court on appeal by Dr Freeman.

On 22 December 2020 (whilst the MPTS hearing was ongoing), UKAD provisionally suspended Dr Freeman and charged him with the commission of Anti-Doping Rule Violations. He was charged with an Article 2.6 violation under the 2009 UK Anti-Doping Rules for ‘Possession of a Prohibited Substance’, namely testosterone, in connection with an Athlete, Event or training."

He was struck off by the GMC. He shouldn’t work in sport again, he is a doping doctor. Let’s not forget the jiffy bag, which was maybe for Wiggins and all the traimcinalone they had. Geert Leinders taught them well.

2 Likes

Fairly sure it was on the BBC yesterday, obviously didn’t name the cyclist but I guess that unless they failed a test they’re presumed innocent?

1 Like

They don’t know who the rider is so they are all innocent, even the ones they didn’t catch doping

1 Like

Plenty of amateurs who dope, plenty of reasons why you’d not dope on your doorstep.

I mean of course the Sky and BC riders were doping, but that doesn’t mean it was him doing it with this order, and very unlikely they were sourcing the materials in such a shit way - much more likely to my mind that this was some off the BC/Sky books doping so as to make some money on the side.

2 Likes

No need to fail a test to be guilty of doping.

2 Likes

But surely an amateur could just get a prescription? They would only need a TUE if you get caught.

Following his GMC hearings he seems a bit flakey, I wonder if he was just a rubbish doping doctor. Certainly no Geert Leinders.

Just ask David Millar :roll_eyes:

1 Like

You cannot get a TUE for it.

1 Like

I didn’t know that was a rule for amateurs so had a look. You can get TUE for T use but not for age related low T as a natural part of aging. Not sure a doctor could easily make up a reason for the valid TUE for testosterone either. For amateurs then it is just a case of knowing your glow time and use it appropriately, or perhaps inappropriately.

3 Likes

:judge: :phone:

4 Likes