Flanders.
About as exciting as Suzuka
Flanders.
About as exciting as Suzuka
Yawn ..!!
At least he waited until 30km to go
Jokes.
Not funny.
He should do it in tweed, on a bone-shaker. Proper classic.
P-R by text is not as enjoyable as watching it on tv
Oops!
What a shame for Pedersen, looks like he was in great form and a change from the two main suspects.
Yeah. Annoying race really.
Shame the winner was the âluckiestâ one of the day.
(Brackets for irony. So back off)
That said PR has always involved mechanical fortune; probably even more so when they rode on skinny tyres?
Whilst Pog has a long way to match Merckx on the all-time list, he is really rather dominant across all disciplines right now. Something Lance could never match.
I guess most already know this, but how depressing:
The menâs Tour de France will be broadcast live on ITV4 and online on ITVX, with highlights also aired each evening of the menâs race at 8pm. However 2025 will be the final year of free-to-air live coverage of WorldTour level cycling on ITV. No other channel has stepped up to fill that position and TNT Sports has bought the exclusive rights to show the Tour until 2030.
As of March 2025, freeview channel Quest will broadcast race highlights from the Grand Tours. In addition, âThe Ultimate Cycling Showâ, hosted by Orla Chennaoui and Adam Blythe, will begin airing at the end of February and will discuss the weekâs news in pro cycling.
I think in the past they rode a lot more specialist kit for P-R. Now the manufacturers want to show that you can do it on the standard kit
They always used to use tubs, so if they punctured they could still roll on a bit with them. Tubeless tyres donât seem to do so well when fully deflated and are likely to roll off the rim completely.
I think thereâs a certain amount of making your own luck in P-R. If you ride the crown of the road itâs a bit rougher, but youâre less likely to puncture than if you are riding the edges.
I think may still produce Tubulars specially for the cobbled classics; certainly some riders were still using them when theyâd generally moved to clinchers.
Itâll be interesting to watch.
Cycling is funny, because there is a large affluent audience although that doesnât necessarily translate into spending (as per this thread, with a largely middle class contribution). Cyclists also like to be different, and Eurosport fed into that self view.
TNT must think they can capture new subscribers, though.
I already have TNT sports, and itâs ridiculously similar to Eurosport without the feel good hipster factor.
Is the cycling coverage on TNT not just the same stuff that was on Eurosport previously?
Similar, not sure itâs exactly the same.
Slight rebranding of the studio, and a couple of new faces (not many, though).
Seems to be slightly more âprofessionalâ than Eurosport too.
That said might just be me looking for changes.
I hadnât considered that TNT bought cycling with a hope to monetise it, just that it came with a deal they had done to take over Eurosport in the UK.
If they were serious about making money from cyclists, they would surely offer a stripped back subscription that takes out the football and whatever else pays the day to day bills and offer it stand-alone. It is ironic that subscription on demand was supposed to offer the viewer the chance to pay for only what they want to watch, instead you seem to have to pay for everything even if you donât want it.
I think theyâd need clearer demographic segregation for that, eg all footballers hate cycling, all cyclers hate footballing.
At least the way tv is done now, I suppose algorithmic pricing could revolutionise thatâŠ
I canât remember where I saw it, but there was a back of the fag packet calculation that theyâd need to sell very few subscriptions to cycling fans to make up for the money that they were previously getting from Eurosport as part of the basic Sky package.
Obviously thatâs not going to help anyone looking to get their team sponsored by a UK company if no one in the UK is watching